[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e5c0d90-d1ec-15ca-c07a-d43f52d4d69a@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:35:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, sre@...nel.org, chiaen_wu@...htek.com,
cy_huang@...htek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: mt6370: fix the interrupt order of
the charger in the example
On 05/10/2022 10:59, ChiaEn Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 4:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
> ...
>>
>> Eh, my patch was merged in July... and yours from September still does
>> not use updated multi-led bindings. Was it even tested before sending?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> I must apologize for checking our patches are based on v5.19 (I also
> forgot to apply your patch before checking patches......), not the
> v6.0-rc series at that time.
> I will update the latest code and check my patch again and again
> before submitting the patch next time.
> I'm very sorry for this mistake.......
Always base your patches on one of: latest mainline kernel, latest
maintainer's tree or recent linux-next.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists