[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221005175149.611068-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:51:49 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: brendan.higgins@...ux.dev, davidgow@...gle.com,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com
Subject: [PATCH] kunit: log numbers in decimal and hex
When KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() or KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() log a failure, they log the
two values being compared, with numerical values logged in decimal.
In some cases, decimal output is painful to consume, and hexadecimal
output would be more helpful. For example, this is the case for tests
I'm currently developing for the arm64 insn encoding/decoding code,
where comparing two 32-bit instruction opcodes results in output such
as:
| # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791
| Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but
| obj_insn == 2332164128
| gen_insn == 1258422304
To make this easier to consume, this patch logs the values in both
decimal and hexadecimal:
| # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791
| Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but
| obj_insn == 2332164128 (0x8b020020)
| gen_insn == 1258422304 (0x4b020020)
As can be seen from the example, having hexadecimal makes it
significantly easier for a human to spot which specific bits are
incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
---
lib/kunit/assert.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c
index d00d6d181ee8..24dec5b48722 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/assert.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c
@@ -127,13 +127,15 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
binary_assert->text->right_text);
if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->left_text,
binary_assert->left_value, stream->gfp))
- string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n",
+ string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld (0x%llx)\n",
binary_assert->text->left_text,
+ binary_assert->left_value,
binary_assert->left_value);
if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->right_text,
binary_assert->right_value, stream->gfp))
- string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld",
+ string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld (0x%llx)",
binary_assert->text->right_text,
+ binary_assert->right_value,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream);
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists