linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/34] pinctrl/arm64: qcom: continued - fix Qualcomm TLMM pinctrl schema warnings (5th set)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52d2b67a-5f5b-0c71-a455-f30b0b7afd57@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 22:21:36 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@...cinc.com>,
        Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] pinctrl/arm64: qcom: continued - fix Qualcomm TLMM
 pinctrl schema warnings (5th set)

On 06/10/2022 17:49, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>>  .../qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml        | 13 ++--
>>  .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-pinctrl.yaml | 22 ++----
> 
> Just a random thought since you are already doing minor style cleanups
> here: Some of these files are named incorrectly, e.g. qcom,sm8450-pinctrl.yaml
> actually documents "qcom,sm8450-tlmm". I noticed this while adding
> qcom,msm8909-tlmm but I have to admit that it did not bother me enough
> to actually prepare a patch for this (and now it would just conflict
> with all your patches). :)
> 
> No need to change anything here, just thought I'd mention it.

Sure, I can change this as well. Thanks for sharing!

Best regards,
Krzysztof