[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221006094729.61ff9b24@xps-13>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:47:29 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: mpc5121: Replace NO_IRQ by 0
Hi Christophe,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu wrote on Thu, 6 Oct 2022 07:29:12 +0200:
> NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().
>
> On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.
>
> irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.
>
> So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Deserves Fixes and Cc:stable tags, isn't it?
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c
> index 800d774aed8e..f68349cb7824 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c
> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ static int mpc5121_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> }
>
> prv->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dn, 0);
> - if (prv->irq == NO_IRQ) {
> + if (!prv->irq) {
> dev_err(dev, "Error mapping IRQ!\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists