[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c62aa44-c282-0d8c-7f4d-530b5e6db3e8@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:18:42 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: mpc5121: Replace NO_IRQ by 0
Hi Miquel
Le 06/10/2022 à 09:47, Miquel Raynal a écrit :
> Hi Christophe,
>
> christophe.leroy@...roup.eu wrote on Thu, 6 Oct 2022 07:29:12 +0200:
>
>> NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().
>>
>> On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.
>>
>> irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.
>>
>> So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>
> Deserves Fixes and Cc:stable tags, isn't it?
I don't think so, because the only user today is powerpc which defines
NO_IRQ as 0.
In the stable-kernel-rules.rst it is said:
- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing).
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c
>> index 800d774aed8e..f68349cb7824 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mpc5121_nfc.c
>> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ static int mpc5121_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>> }
>>
>> prv->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dn, 0);
>> - if (prv->irq == NO_IRQ) {
>> + if (!prv->irq) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Error mapping IRQ!\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists