linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] iommu/s390: Fix potential s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed96bbb5b2af7cbf8e41f5aa36d31d3f5aae50d5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 06 Oct 2022 17:21:56 +0200
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, jgg@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] iommu/s390: Fix potential s390_domain aperture
 shrinking

On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 16:46 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The s390 IOMMU driver currently sets the IOMMU domain's aperture to
> match the device specific DMA address range of the device that is first
> attached. This is not ideal. For one if the domain has no device
> attached in the meantime the aperture could be shrunk allowing
> translations outside the aperture to exist in the translation tables.
> Also this is a bit of a misuse of the aperture which really should
> describe what addresses can be translated and not some device specific
> limitations.
> 
> Instead of misusing the aperture like this we can instead create
> reserved ranges for the ranges inaccessible to the attached devices
> allowing devices with overlapping ranges to still share an IOMMU domain.
> This also significantly simplifies s390_iommu_attach_device() allowing
> us to move the aperture check to the beginning of the function and
> removing the need to hold the device list's lock to check the aperture.
> 
> As we then use the same aperture for all domains and it only depends on
> the table properties we can already check zdev->start_dma/end_dma at
> probe time and turn the check on attach into a WARN_ON().
> 
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>

@Matt, @Jason I did drop the R-b's here because the change Jason
suggested of changing the aperture check on attach to a WARN_ON() and
checking zdev->start_dma/end_dma on probe is a behavioral change.

> ---
> v4->v5:
> - Make aperture check in attach a WARN_ON() and fail in probe if
>   zdev->start_dma/end_dma doesn't git in aperture  (Jason)
> 
>  drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
> index 9b3ae4b14636..1f6c9bee9a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
---8<---