linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix sample_flags for bpf_perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2022 11:45:36 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To:     Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     olsajiri@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, iii@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, tip-bot2@...utronix.de, tmricht@...ux.ibm.com,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix sample_flags for bpf_perf_event_output

On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 10:13:27AM +0200, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> * Raw data is also filled by bpf_perf_event_output.
> * Add sample_flags to indicate raw data.
> * This eliminates the segfaults as shown below:
>   Run ./samples/bpf/trace_output
>   BUG pid 9 cookie 1001000000004 sized 4
>   BUG pid 9 cookie 1001000000004 sized 4
>   BUG pid 9 cookie 1001000000004 sized 4
>   Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> 
> Fixes: 838d9bb62d13 ("perf: Use sample_flags for raw_data")
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

Peter,
I think this should go through your tree again?
bpf-next/master does not have sample_flags merged yet

thanks,
jirka

> ---
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 49fb9ec8366d..1ed08967fb97 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_perf_event_output, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>  
>  	perf_sample_data_init(sd, 0, 0);
>  	sd->raw = &raw;
> +	sd->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
>  
>  	err = __bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, sd);
>  
> @@ -745,6 +746,7 @@ u64 bpf_event_output(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, void *meta, u64 meta_size,
>  	perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
>  	perf_sample_data_init(sd, 0, 0);
>  	sd->raw = &raw;
> +	sd->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
>  
>  	ret = __bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, sd);
>  out:
> -- 
> 2.36.1
>