linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI: ARM Performance Monitoring Unit Table (APMT) initial support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:49:20 +0000
From:   Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC:     "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI: ARM Performance Monitoring Unit Table (APMT)
 initial support

...
> > The initial support adds the detection of APMT table and generic
> > infrastructure to create platform devices for ARM CoreSight PMUs.
> > Similar to IORT the root pointer of APMT is preserved during runtime
> > and each PMU platform device is given a pointer to the corresponding
> > APMT node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Thanks Rafael!

> 
> for the change in bus.c, but as a side note, it would be good to move
> all of the ARM-specific initialization into one place, so it is not
> necessary to touch bus.c every time a new piece of it is added.
> 

Sudeep, do you have further comments ?

Thanks,
Besar