[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202210080559.lcBRjJ9e-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 05:21:29 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Subject: [kdave-btrfs-devel:stable-6.0 1/1] fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1502:34:
error: too few arguments to function call, expected 7, have 5
tree: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git stable-6.0
head: 3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d
commit: 3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d [1/1] btrfs: unlock locked extent area if we have contention
config: i386-randconfig-a005-20221003
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel/commit/3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d
git remote add kdave-btrfs-devel https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git
git fetch --no-tags kdave-btrfs-devel stable-6.0
git checkout 3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash fs/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1502:34: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 7, have 5
EXTENT_LOCKED, cached_state);
^
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1465:5: note: 'clear_extent_bit' declared here
int clear_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end,
^
>> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1505:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__set_extent_bit' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
err = __set_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED,
^
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1505:9: note: did you mean 'set_extent_bit'?
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1006:5: note: 'set_extent_bit' declared here
int set_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end, u32 bits,
^
2 errors generated.
vim +1502 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
1485
1486 /*
1487 * either insert or lock state struct between start and end use mask to tell
1488 * us if waiting is desired.
1489 */
1490 int lock_extent_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end,
1491 struct extent_state **cached_state)
1492 {
1493 int err;
1494 u64 failed_start;
1495
1496 err = set_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED,
1497 EXTENT_LOCKED, &failed_start,
1498 cached_state, GFP_NOFS, NULL);
1499 while (err == -EEXIST) {
1500 if (failed_start != start)
1501 clear_extent_bit(tree, start, failed_start - 1,
> 1502 EXTENT_LOCKED, cached_state);
1503
1504 wait_extent_bit(tree, failed_start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED);
> 1505 err = __set_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED,
1506 &failed_start, cached_state, NULL,
1507 GFP_NOFS);
1508 }
1509 return err;
1510 }
1511
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (134981 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists