linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdru1000: Add tlmm nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 14:57:13 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdru1000: Add tlmm nodes

On 11/10/2022 14:48, Melody Olvera wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/1/2022 2:14 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/10/2022 05:06, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>> Add tlmm node for the QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs and the uart pin
>>> configuration.
>> The patchset should be squashed with previous. There is no point in
>> bringing support piece by piece. You can bring support in steps if you
>> submissions are separate in time. But if you have everything ready -
>> your patch must be complete and bisectable.
> To be clear, does it make more sense to submit the base dt first, then submit each
> driver with all the dt changes as one patchset?

No, because you have DTS ready. There is no incremental work here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof