linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdru1000: Add tlmm nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3885c1d1-ab6f-2b30-2950-f4dc0ec54152@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:05:19 -0700
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdru1000: Add tlmm nodes



On 10/11/2022 11:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/10/2022 14:48, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>
>> On 10/1/2022 2:14 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 01/10/2022 05:06, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>>> Add tlmm node for the QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs and the uart pin
>>>> configuration.
>>> The patchset should be squashed with previous. There is no point in
>>> bringing support piece by piece. You can bring support in steps if you
>>> submissions are separate in time. But if you have everything ready -
>>> your patch must be complete and bisectable.
>> To be clear, does it make more sense to submit the base dt first, then submit each
>> driver with all the dt changes as one patchset?
> No, because you have DTS ready. There is no incremental work here.
Ah ok so just squash all these commits into one and submit.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Melody