linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: fix the build with binutils 2.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221012022816.5E6C6C433C1@smtp.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:28:14 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: fix the build with binutils 2.27

Quoting Kefeng Wang (2022-10-07 22:15:34)
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h b/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h
> index 3484309b59bf..4fc387d0335d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>  #ifndef AT91_PMC_H
>  #define AT91_PMC_H
>  
> +#include <vdso/bits.h>

Can we just include linux/bits.h instead? It looks weird to include
vdso/ outside of the kernel's vdso.

> +
>  #define AT91_PMC_V1            (1)                     /* PMC version 1 */
>  #define AT91_PMC_V2            (2)                     /* PMC version 2 [SAM9X60] */
>