linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: fix the build with binutils 2.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ddc71922-c7cd-a8ef-057d-7d2b25d31305@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:46:09 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: fix the build with binutils 2.27


On 2022/10/12 10:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Kefeng Wang (2022-10-07 22:15:34)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h b/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h
>> index 3484309b59bf..4fc387d0335d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>>   #ifndef AT91_PMC_H
>>   #define AT91_PMC_H
>>   
>> +#include <vdso/bits.h>
> Can we just include linux/bits.h instead? It looks weird to include
> vdso/ outside of the kernel's vdso.
sure, will send v2.
>> +
>>   #define AT91_PMC_V1            (1)                     /* PMC version 1 */
>>   #define AT91_PMC_V2            (2)                     /* PMC version 2 [SAM9X60] */
>>
> .