linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] Some pstore improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:59:13 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ardb@...nel.org, kernel@...ccoli.net, anton@...msg.org,
        ccross@...roid.com, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        kernel-dev@...lia.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Some pstore improvements

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:50:50PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 06/10/2022 20:24, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 19:42:04 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> >> overall. Most of them are minors, but the implicit conversion thing
> >> is a bit more "relevant" in a sense it's more invasive and would fit
> >> more as a "fix".
> >>
> >> The code is based on v6.0, and it was tested with multiple compression
> >> algorithms (zstd, deflate, lz4, lzo, 842) and two backends (ramoops and
> >> efi_pstore) - I've used a QEMU UEFI guest and Steam Deck for this goal.
> >>
> >> [...]
> > 
> > Applied to for-next/pstore, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/8] pstore: Improve error reporting in case of backend overlap
> >       https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/55dbe25ee4c8
> > [2/8] pstore: Expose kmsg_bytes as a module parameter
> >       https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/1af13c2b6324
> > [3/8] pstore: Inform unregistered backend names as well
> >       https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/a4f92789f799
> > 
> 
> Thanks Kees! just a heads-up on how I'll proceed.
> 
> (a) Patches 1-3 were added already.
> 
> (b) MAINTAINERS patch was reworked by yourself in the other series, so
> I'll discard my version.
> 
> (c) I'll rework patches 4 and 8 and re-submit them plus patch 7
> (including the ACK from Ard).
> 
> (d) Gonna discard for now patch 5, planning to test a new version on top
> of the crypto acomp interface V2 from Ard/you.

Sounds good; thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook