[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166576925933.1456464.15444113469951956884.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:41:04 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: gpiccoli@...lia.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, ardb@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, anton@...msg.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, ccross@...roid.com,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 7/8] efi: pstore: Follow convention for the efi-pstore backend name
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 19:42:11 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> For some reason, the efi-pstore backend name (exposed through the
> pstore infrastructure) is hardcoded as "efi", whereas all the other
> backends follow a kind of convention in using the module name.
>
> Let's do it here as well, to make user's life easier (they might
> use this info for unloading the module backend, for example).
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next/pstore, thanks!
[7/8] efi: pstore: Follow convention for the efi-pstore backend name
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/39bae0ee0656
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists