linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Add support for TEE for PCI ID 0x14CA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MN0PR12MB61019C1F5A24EB8163EE04CCE2259@MN0PR12MB6101.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 04:01:29 +0000
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Thomas, Rijo-john" <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        "Allen, John" <John.Allen@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Add support for TEE for PCI ID 0x14CA

[Public]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 20:56
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org; Thomas, Rijo-john <Rijo-
> john.Thomas@....com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; linux-
> crypto@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Lendacky, Thomas
> <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>; Allen, John <John.Allen@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Add support for TEE for PCI ID 0x14CA
> 
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:42:32AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> >
> > Some other maintainers take new IDs as fixes.  Particularly when they're
> > good candidates for cc stable.
> >
> > The main reason I wanted to see it sooner is so that it has more time to
> > percolate to the various downstream distros so that errors stemming from
> the
> > lack of this ID declaration aren't prevalent when using this SOC.
> 
> Sorry but this is not persuasive enough for me.  If you want a patch
> to make a particular merge window, make sure that you get it in early
> enough.

OK thanks!