[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pmew6q3d.fsf@ovpn-194-196.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:16:22 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: selftests: Test Hyper-V invariant TSC control
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
>>
...
>> > Aha! Idea. Assuming none of the MSRs are write-only, what about adding a prep
>> > patch to rework this code so that it verifies RDMSR returns what was written when
>> > a fault didn't occur.
>> >
>>
>> There is at least one read-only MSR which comes to mind:
>> HV_X64_MSR_EOI.
>
> I assume s/read-only/write-only since it's EOI?
>
Yes, of course)
>> Also, some of the MSRs don't preserve the written value,
>> e.g. HV_X64_MSR_RESET which always reads as '0'.
>
> Hrm, that's annoying.
'Slightly annoying'. In fact, the test never writes anything besides '0'
to the MSR as the code is not ready to handle real vCPU reset. I'll
leave a TODO note about that.
...
> static bool is_write_only_msr(uint32_t msr)
> {
> return msr == HV_X64_MSR_EOI;
> }
This is all we need, basically. I'll go with that.
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists