[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0gpsTiUqa/ZbvRh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:07:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Cody Yao-oc <CodyYao-oc@...oxin.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shyaololo@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fixed kernel panic during boot on Nano
processor.
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:31:09AM +0800, Cody Yao-oc wrote:
> From: CodyYao-oc <CodyYao-oc@...oxin.com>
>
> Nano processor may not fully support rdpmc instruction, it works well
> for reading general pmc counter, but will lead to GP(general protection)
> when accessing fixed pmc counter. Futhermore, family/model information
> is same between Nano processor and ZX-C processor, it leads to zhaoxin
> pmu driver is wrongly loaded for Nano processor, which resulting boot
> kernal fail.
>
> To solve this problem, stepping information will be checked to distinguish
> between Nano processor and ZX-C processor.
>
> [https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212389]
>
> Reported-by: Arjan <8vvbbqzo567a@...pam.xutrox.com>
> Signed-off-by: CodyYao-oc <CodyYao-oc@...oxin.com>
*sigh*.. so this email address doesn't exist, as such I can't apply this
patch. Consider it dropped.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists