linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched/psi: Fix avgs_work re-arm in psi_avgs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:18:32 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc:     surenb@...gle.com, quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        quic_charante@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/psi: Fix avgs_work re-arm in psi_avgs_work()

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:05:51PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Pavan reported a problem that PSI avgs_work idle shutoff is not
> working at all. Because PSI_NONIDLE condition would be observed in
> psi_avgs_work()->collect_percpu_times()->get_recent_times() even if
> only the kworker running avgs_work on the CPU.
> 
> Although commit 1b69ac6b40eb ("psi: fix aggregation idle shut-off")
> avoided the ping-pong wake problem when the worker sleep, psi_avgs_work()
> still will always re-arm the avgs_work, so shutoff is not working.
> 
> This patch changes to use PSI_STATE_RESCHEDULE to flag whether to
> re-arm avgs_work in get_recent_times(). For the current CPU, we re-arm
> avgs_work only when (NR_RUNNING > 1 || NR_IOWAIT > 0 || NR_MEMSTALL > 0),
> for other CPUs we can just check PSI_NONIDLE delta. The new flag
> is only used in psi_avgs_work(), so we check in get_recent_times()
> that current_work() is avgs_work.
> 
> One potential problem is that the brief period of non-idle time
> incurred between the aggregation run and the kworker's dequeue will
> be stranded in the per-cpu buckets until avgs_work run next time.
> The buckets can hold 4s worth of time, and future activity will wake
> the avgs_work with a 2s delay, giving us 2s worth of data we can leave
> behind when shut off the avgs_work. If the kworker run other works after
> avgs_work shut off and doesn't have any scheduler activities for 2s,
> this maybe a problem.
> 
> Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>