lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpEQPpVZ+0Nyb52y30y=5+XBqMqKkvQ93NZtOistrjAC1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:41:23 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
        quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        quic_charante@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/psi: Fix avgs_work re-arm in psi_avgs_work()

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 7:18 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:05:51PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> > Pavan reported a problem that PSI avgs_work idle shutoff is not
> > working at all. Because PSI_NONIDLE condition would be observed in
> > psi_avgs_work()->collect_percpu_times()->get_recent_times() even if
> > only the kworker running avgs_work on the CPU.
> >
> > Although commit 1b69ac6b40eb ("psi: fix aggregation idle shut-off")
> > avoided the ping-pong wake problem when the worker sleep, psi_avgs_work()
> > still will always re-arm the avgs_work, so shutoff is not working.
> >
> > This patch changes to use PSI_STATE_RESCHEDULE to flag whether to
> > re-arm avgs_work in get_recent_times(). For the current CPU, we re-arm
> > avgs_work only when (NR_RUNNING > 1 || NR_IOWAIT > 0 || NR_MEMSTALL > 0),
> > for other CPUs we can just check PSI_NONIDLE delta. The new flag
> > is only used in psi_avgs_work(), so we check in get_recent_times()
> > that current_work() is avgs_work.
> >
> > One potential problem is that the brief period of non-idle time
> > incurred between the aggregation run and the kworker's dequeue will
> > be stranded in the per-cpu buckets until avgs_work run next time.
> > The buckets can hold 4s worth of time, and future activity will wake
> > the avgs_work with a 2s delay, giving us 2s worth of data we can leave
> > behind when shut off the avgs_work. If the kworker run other works after
> > avgs_work shut off and doesn't have any scheduler activities for 2s,
> > this maybe a problem.
> >
> > Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Please make sure to test the final version. With that done,

Acked-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ