lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:40:56 -1000 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf stat: Support old kernels for bperf cgroup counting On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:27:40AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Hey, I noticed that the perf build is broken for the > tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/bperf_cgroup.bpf.c skell, so I tried using b4 > on this Namhyung patch, it ended up getting a newer version, by Tejun, > that mixes up kernel code and tooling, which, when I tried to apply > upstream didn't work. > > Please try not to mix up kernel and tools/ changes in the same patch to > avoid these issues. I didn't write a newer version of this patch. What are you talking about? -- tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists