[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221017174915.45916-1-pmanank200502@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:19:15 +0530
From: Manank Patel <pmanank200502@...il.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Manank Patel <pmanank200502@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes: 91cefefb6991 ("ACPI: PCC: replace wait_for_completion()")
Fixed unintentional u32 overflow by changing PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM to 500ULL
Signed-off-by: Manank Patel <pmanank200502@...il.com>
---
Sorry for the spam, I made a mistake in the previous patch (I had a confusion
in your suggestion about the Fixes tag).As you would have realised, i'm new
to this, and not so familiar with the workflow (Though I have read the
Documentation). Let me know if you have any suggestions.
drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
index ee4ce5ba1fb2..3e252be047b8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
* Arbitrary retries in case the remote processor is slow to respond
* to PCC commands
*/
-#define PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM 500
+#define PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM 500ULL
struct pcc_data {
struct pcc_mbox_chan *pcc_chan;
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists