[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <365c0b94-c619-3790-c23a-5582631dd208@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:00:13 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Siarhei Volkau <lis8215@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add Ingenic JZ4755 CGU header
On 16/10/2022 14:21, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> вс, 16 окт. 2022 г. в 18:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:
>
>> Why did you choose 2.0+?
>
> It's the first time that I need to choose a license, so it's a bit
> confusing what
> side effects they have, especially in that particular case.
>
> What do you recommend?
Choice was fine, just not common so I was just wondering. You can keep
it but usually we choose what the checkpatch is asking for - so GPL-2.0
(only )or BSD-2-clause.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists