[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79b12322-4298-2a2f-c126-a00071e31f1d@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 08:22:41 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Böhmwalder
<christoph.boehmwalder@...bit.com>
Cc: drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Colledge <joel.colledge@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: Store op in drbd_peer_request
On 10/17/22 3:01 AM, Christoph B?hmwalder wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
> index 4d661282ff41..0f8e3b94a635 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
> @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ struct drbd_peer_request {
> struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device;
> struct drbd_epoch *epoch; /* for writes */
> struct page *pages;
> + unsigned int opf; /* to be used as bi_opf */
Why isn't this blk_opf_t?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists