[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y07wfi7XSxHWr7LD@rric.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:41:47 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Terry Bowman" <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] cxl/acpi: Extract component registers of
restricted hosts from RCRB
On 18.10.22 15:31:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:24 PM Robert Richter <rrichter@....com> wrote:
> >
> > A downstream port must be connected to a component register block.
> > For restricted hosts the base address is determined from the RCRB. The
> > RCRB is provided by the host's CEDT CHBS entry. Rework CEDT parser to
> > get the RCRB and add code to extract the component register block from
> > it.
> >
> > RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to the component block containing CXL subsystem
> > component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows the PCI base spec here,
> > esp. 64 bit extraction and memory range alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1).
> >
> > Note: Right now the component register block is used for HDM decoder
> > capability only which is optional for RCDs. If unsupported by the RCD,
> > the HDM init will fail. It is future work to bypass it in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
>
> What does this S-o-B mean? If this person is your co-developer, you
> need to add a Co-developed-by tag to clarify that.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
I picked up an early patch and modified it significantly, so I just
left the S-o-B. I could change this to a Co-developed-by tag. IMO, the
S-o-B is ok, but could be wrong here.
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists