linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add iommu and power-domain support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19c9988a5cfc94c5774c3729671cf20ee61a0971.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:49:15 +0000
From:   TingHan Shen (沈廷翰) 
        <TingHan.Shen@...iatek.com>
To:     "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group 
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        Jianjun Wang (王建军) 
        <Jianjun.Wang@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add iommu and
 power-domain support

Hi Rob,

On Mon, 2022-10-17 at 13:42 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:08:56PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> > From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > Add iommu and power-domain support, and add examples for MT8195, which
> > has two PCIe ports with different clocks and phys.
> 
> Is that really a big enough difference to add a whole other example 
> when we have a dts file with it too? I don't think so, and we certainly 
> don't need to show all instances either.
> 
> Rob

Ok, I'll remove the example at next version.
Thank you.


Best regards,
TingHan