[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221017184233.GA2260080-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:42:33 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add iommu and
power-domain support
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:08:56PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>
>
> Add iommu and power-domain support, and add examples for MT8195, which
> has two PCIe ports with different clocks and phys.
Is that really a big enough difference to add a whole other example
when we have a dts file with it too? I don't think so, and we certainly
don't need to show all instances either.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists