linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: Enable locking for n25q256ax1/mt25qu256a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:23:22 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
Cc:     tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com, pratyush@...nel.org,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        talel@...zon.com, jonnyc@...zon.com, hhhawa@...zon.com,
        hanochu@...zon.com, itamark@...zon.com, shellykz@...zon.com,
        amitlavi@...zon.com, dkl@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: Enable locking for
 n25q256ax1/mt25qu256a

Am 2022-10-19 11:52, schrieb Farber, Eliav:
> On 10/19/2022 12:38 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Am 2022-10-19 11:25, schrieb Farber, Eliav:
>>> On 10/19/2022 11:21 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Am 2022-10-19 09:16, schrieb Eliav Farber:
>>>>> n25q256ax1 [1] and mt25qu256a [2] (both have same jedec_id -
>>>>> 0x20bb19)
>>>>> use the 4 bit Block Protection scheme and support Top/Bottom
>>>>> protection
>>>>> via the BP and TB bits of the Status Register.
>>>>> BP3 is located in bit 6 of the Status Register.
>>>>> Tested on both n25q256ax1 and mt25qu256a.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nor-flash/serial-nor/n25q/n25q_256mb_3v.pdf 
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nor-flash/serial-nor/mt25q/die-rev-a/mt25q_qljs_u_256_aba_0.pdf
>>>> 
>>>> If you respin, you can use a "Link:" tag for the URL above.
>>> 
>>> Ack.
>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> xxd -p
>>>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc/fd882000.spi/spi_master/spi0/spi0.0/spi-nor/sfdp 
>>>>> 53464450060101ff00060110300000ff84000102800000ffffffffffffff
>>>>> ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe520fbffffffff0f29eb276b
>>>>> 273b27bbffffffffffff27bbffff29eb0c2010d80f520000244a99008b8e
>>>>> 03d4ac0127387a757a75fbbdd55c4a0f82ff81bd3d36ffffffffffffffff
>>>>> ffffffffffffffffffe7ffff21dcffff
>>>>> 
>>>>> md5sum
>>>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc/fd882000.spi/spi_master/spi0/spi0.0/spi-nor/sfdp 
>>>>> 5ea738216f68c9f98987bb3725699a32
>>>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc/fd882000.spi/spi_master/spi0/spi0.0/spi-nor/sfdp 
>>>>> cat
>>>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc/fd882000.spi/spi_master/spi0/spi0.0/spi-nor/jedec_id 
>>>>> 20bb19104400
>>>>> 
>>>>> cat
>>>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc/fd882000.spi/spi_master/spi0/spi0.0/spi-nor/partname 
>>>>> mt25qu256a
>>>>> 
>>>>> cat
>>>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc/fd882000.spi/spi_master/spi0/spi0.0/spi-nor/manufacturer 
>>>>> st
>>>> 
>>>> That's the mt25qu256a SFDP. What about the n25q256ax1?
>>> 
>>> On the same card, with same NOR flash memory I'm running two 
>>> different
>>> kernel versions.
>>> First version is quite old - 4.19.239 which does not support 
>>> mt25qu256a
>>> and therefore device is detected as n25q256ax1.
>>> Second version is 6.1.0-rc1 and it detects the same device as
>>> mt25qu256a.
>>> So I was able to dump SFDP when running version 6.1.0-rc1, but not 
>>> when
>>> running 4.19.239 which does not support the sysfs to dump the SFPD
>>> information.
>>> I checked that locking works with my changes when running on both
>>> kernel
>>> versions.
>> 
>> So you've only tested on an mt25qu256a, correct? Then you should only
>> add the locking to this flash device. (and maybe backport the 
>> mt25qu256a
>> to your older kernel).
> 
> I dumped SFDP tables only for mt25qu256a, but as I mentioned I tested
> locking functionality for both (on 4.19.239 which detects the device as
> n25q256ax1 and on 6.1.0-rc1  which detects the device as mt25qu256a).
> This is the flow I used for testing the change on both versions:

You said you've tested on the same board, thus it has the same flash
device. But with the older kernel it was detected as a different part.

So the question is, what is the correct part number? I.e. what is the
_actual_ flash device soldered on your board?

-michael