[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4763163.GXAFRqVoOG@watet-ms7b87>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:07:58 +0200
From: Cleo John <waterdev@...axycrow.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: fix styling in ucontext header
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 22:41:08 CEST, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:55:17PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> > Am Montag, 10. Oktober 2022, 20:50:56 CEST schrieb Conor Dooley:
> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 08:28:48PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> > > > Change the two comments in ucontext.h by getting them up to
> > > > the coding style proposed by torvalds.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cleo John <waterdev@...axycrow.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > In my opinion this also improves the readability so I think this is a useful change to do.
> > > > Please also tell me if you have a different opinion.
> > >
> > > I don't think it is all that /important/ of a change, but it does make
> > > things match between this file and the other headers.
> > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, its not that important. Thats why I chose it. :D
>
> :)
>
> > To be honest this is my first commit to the kernel so
> > I wanted to do something simple to start things of
> > easy and to get more familiar with the procedure,
> > before getting my feet wet into some real kernel
> > additions.
>
> Cool, nice to have you & good luck!
>
> > Thanks for helping!
>
> nw, hopefully I wasn't too direct/negative.
>
> Conor.
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - change the styling of the top comments too
> > > >
> > > > arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h | 12 ++++++++----
> > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > > index 44eb993950e5..516bd0bb0da5 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > > @@ -15,19 +15,23 @@ struct ucontext {
> > > > struct ucontext *uc_link;
> > > > stack_t uc_stack;
> > > > sigset_t uc_sigmask;
> > > > - /* There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
> > > > * future. Though this is unlikely, other architectures put uc_sigmask
> > > > * at the end of this structure and explicitly state it can be
> > > > - * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here. */
> > > > + * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here.
> > > > + */
> > > > __u8 __unused[1024 / 8 - sizeof(sigset_t)];
> > > > - /* We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> > > > * to be able to expand sigcontext in the future. For example, the
> > > > * vector ISA extension will almost certainly add ISA state. We want
> > > > * to ensure all user-visible ISA state can be saved and restored via a
> > > > * ucontext, so we're putting this at the end in order to allow for
> > > > * infinite extensibility. Since we know this will be extended and we
> > > > * assume sigset_t won't be extended an extreme amount, we're
> > > > - * prioritizing this. */
> > > > + * prioritizing this.
> > > > + */
> > > > struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Hey, because I am new to Kernel submissions I wanted to ask if there is a way for me to see / track how far this commit has gone in the pipeline of commits?
Thanks,
Cleo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists