lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4763163.GXAFRqVoOG@watet-ms7b87>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:07:58 +0200
From:   Cleo John <waterdev@...axycrow.de>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: fix styling in ucontext header

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 22:41:08 CEST, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:55:17PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> > Am Montag, 10. Oktober 2022, 20:50:56 CEST schrieb Conor Dooley:
> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 08:28:48PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> > > > Change the two comments in ucontext.h by getting them up to
> > > > the coding style proposed by torvalds.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cleo John <waterdev@...axycrow.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > In my opinion this also improves the readability so I think this is a useful change to do.
> > > > Please also tell me if you have a different opinion.
> > > 
> > > I don't think it is all that /important/ of a change, but it does make
> > > things match between this file and the other headers.
> > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, its not that important. Thats why I chose it. :D
> 
> :)
> 
> > To be honest this is my first commit to the kernel so 
> > I wanted to do something simple to start things of
> > easy and to get more familiar with the procedure,
> > before getting my feet wet into some real kernel
> > additions.
> 
> Cool, nice to have you & good luck!
> 
> > Thanks for helping!
> 
> nw, hopefully I wasn't too direct/negative.
> 
> Conor.
> 
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > >  - change the styling of the top comments too
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h | 12 ++++++++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > > index 44eb993950e5..516bd0bb0da5 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > > @@ -15,19 +15,23 @@ struct ucontext {
> > > >  	struct ucontext	 *uc_link;
> > > >  	stack_t		  uc_stack;
> > > >  	sigset_t	  uc_sigmask;
> > > > -	/* There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
> > > >  	 * future.  Though this is unlikely, other architectures put uc_sigmask
> > > >  	 * at the end of this structure and explicitly state it can be
> > > > -	 * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here. */
> > > > +	 * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here.
> > > > +	 */
> > > >  	__u8		  __unused[1024 / 8 - sizeof(sigset_t)];
> > > > -	/* We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> > > >  	 * to be able to expand sigcontext in the future.  For example, the
> > > >  	 * vector ISA extension will almost certainly add ISA state.  We want
> > > >  	 * to ensure all user-visible ISA state can be saved and restored via a
> > > >  	 * ucontext, so we're putting this at the end in order to allow for
> > > >  	 * infinite extensibility.  Since we know this will be extended and we
> > > >  	 * assume sigset_t won't be extended an extreme amount, we're
> > > > -	 * prioritizing this. */
> > > > +	 * prioritizing this.
> > > > +	 */
> > > >  	struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 

Hey, because I am new to Kernel submissions I wanted to ask if there is a way for me to see / track how far this commit has gone in the pipeline of commits?

Thanks,
Cleo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ