linux-kernel - [RFC 2/6] s390/pci: prepare is_passed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221019144435.369902-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:44:31 +0200
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Julian Ruess <julianr@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC 2/6] s390/pci: prepare is_passed_through() for dma-iommu

With the IOMMU always controlled through the IOMMU driver testing for
zdev->s390_domain is not a valid indication of the device being
passed-through. Instead test if zdev->kzdev is set.

Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c
index b9324ca2eb94..4ef5a6a1d618 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c
@@ -59,9 +59,16 @@ static inline bool ers_result_indicates_abort(pci_ers_result_t ers_res)
 	}
 }
 
-static bool is_passed_through(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
+static bool is_passed_through(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
-	return zdev->s390_domain;
+	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
+	bool ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&zdev->kzdev_lock);
+	ret = !!zdev->kzdev;
+	mutex_unlock(&zdev->kzdev_lock);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static bool is_driver_supported(struct pci_driver *driver)
@@ -176,7 +183,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t zpci_event_attempt_error_recovery(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	}
 	pdev->error_state = pci_channel_io_frozen;
 
-	if (is_passed_through(to_zpci(pdev))) {
+	if (is_passed_through(pdev)) {
 		pr_info("%s: Cannot be recovered in the host because it is a pass-through device\n",
 			pci_name(pdev));
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -239,7 +246,7 @@ static void zpci_event_io_failure(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_channel_state_t es)
 	 * we will inject the error event and let the guest recover the device
 	 * itself.
 	 */
-	if (is_passed_through(to_zpci(pdev)))
+	if (is_passed_through(pdev))
 		goto out;
 	driver = to_pci_driver(pdev->dev.driver);
 	if (driver && driver->err_handler && driver->err_handler->error_detected)
-- 
2.34.1