lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:03:11 +0000 From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org> CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "brgerst@...il.com" <brgerst@...il.com>, "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/5] x86: Enable LKGS instruction > On Wed, Oct 19 2022 at 03:23, Xin Li wrote: > > LKGS instruction is introduced with Intel FRED (flexible return and > > event > > delivery) specification https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/678938. > > So I have two versions of the same thing in my inbox now. What's the > difference? No difference at all. Sorry for the confusion, but maybe I have an excuse. A few days ago, I sent an email to the LKML and it seems lost. I got to know it until Nathan Chancellor replied; and my original message doesn't show up here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y02eZ6A%2Fvlj8+B%2Fc@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/ Last night I sent this patch set to the LKML and waited half an hour, they still didn't show up, so I did it again, but this time both worked. I have sent an email to owner-linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org asking for help. Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists