[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR1101MB216139DE17AE8AABBEF0BCD0A8099@BN6PR1101MB2161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:25:14 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"brgerst@...il.com" <brgerst@...il.com>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/5] x86: Enable LKGS instruction
> > On Wed, Oct 19 2022 at 03:23, Xin Li wrote:
> > > LKGS instruction is introduced with Intel FRED (flexible return and
> > > event
> > > delivery) specification https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/678938.
> >
> > So I have two versions of the same thing in my inbox now. What's the
> > difference?
Hi Thomas,
Should I resend it?
Xin
>
> No difference at all.
>
> Sorry for the confusion, but maybe I have an excuse. A few days ago, I sent an
> email to the LKML and it seems lost. I got to know it until Nathan Chancellor
> replied; and my original message doesn't show up here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y02eZ6A%2Fvlj8+B%2Fc@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
>
> Last night I sent this patch set to the LKML and waited half an hour, they still
> didn't show up, so I did it again, but this time both worked.
>
> I have sent an email to owner-linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org asking for help.
>
> Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists