[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6650b077-1900-a6e6-755e-a84282e5fd13@linexp.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:50 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...exp.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, abailon@...libre.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
broonie@...nel.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
heiko@...ech.de, hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, talel@...zon.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
digetx@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, anarsoul@...il.com,
tiny.windzz@...il.com, baolin.wang7@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, glaroque@...libre.com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
niklas.soderlund@...natech.se, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
j-keerthy@...com, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/33] thermal/of: Rework the thermal device tree
initialization
Hi Ido,
On 18/10/2022 12:29, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 12:43:17AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> +struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_of_zone_register(struct device_node *sensor, int id, void *data,
>> + const struct thermal_zone_device_ops *ops)
>> +{
>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>> + struct thermal_trip *trips;
>> + struct thermal_zone_params *tzp;
>> + struct thermal_zone_device_ops *of_ops;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + int delay, pdelay;
>> + int ntrips, mask;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + of_ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!of_ops)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + np = of_thermal_zone_find(sensor, id);
>> + if (IS_ERR(np)) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to find thermal zone for %pOFn id=%d\n", sensor, id);
>> + return ERR_CAST(np);
>> + }
>> +
>> + trips = thermal_of_trips_init(np, &ntrips);
>> + if (IS_ERR(trips)) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to find trip points for %pOFn id=%d\n", sensor, id);
>> + return ERR_CAST(trips);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = thermal_of_monitor_init(np, &delay, &pdelay);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to initialize monitoring delays from %pOFn\n", np);
>> + goto out_kfree_trips;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tzp = thermal_of_parameters_init(np);
>> + if (IS_ERR(tzp)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(tzp);
>> + pr_err("Failed to initialize parameter from %pOFn: %d\n", np, ret);
>> + goto out_kfree_trips;
>> + }
>> +
>> + of_ops->get_trip_type = of_ops->get_trip_type ? : of_thermal_get_trip_type;
>> + of_ops->get_trip_temp = of_ops->get_trip_temp ? : of_thermal_get_trip_temp;
>> + of_ops->get_trip_hyst = of_ops->get_trip_hyst ? : of_thermal_get_trip_hyst;
>> + of_ops->set_trip_hyst = of_ops->set_trip_hyst ? : of_thermal_set_trip_hyst;
>> + of_ops->get_crit_temp = of_ops->get_crit_temp ? : of_thermal_get_crit_temp;
>> + of_ops->bind = thermal_of_bind;
>> + of_ops->unbind = thermal_of_unbind;
>> +
>> + mask = GENMASK_ULL((ntrips) - 1, 0);
>> +
>> + tz = thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(np->name, trips, ntrips,
>> + mask, data, of_ops, tzp,
>> + pdelay, delay);
>> + if (IS_ERR(tz)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(tz);
>> + pr_err("Failed to register thermal zone %pOFn: %d\n", np, ret);
>> + goto out_kfree_tzp;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = thermal_zone_device_enable(tz);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to enabled thermal zone '%s', id=%d: %d\n",
>> + tz->type, tz->id, ret);
>> + thermal_of_zone_unregister(tz);
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return tz;
>> +
>> +out_kfree_tzp:
>> + kfree(tzp);
>> +out_kfree_trips:
>> + kfree(trips);
>> +
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_of_zone_register);
>
> Daniel, I started seeing these memory leaks [1] since commit
> 613ed3f67609 ("hwmon: pm_bus: core: Switch to new of thermal API").
> Seems to be fixed by the following patch [2].
>
> Do you already have a patch for this issue or should I submit it?
Thanks for reporting the issue. If you can submit it, that would be great
Powered by blists - more mailing lists