[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1BeZYBf/xsW8F4O@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:00:29 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com, saurabh.truth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] staging: most: dim2: correct misleading struct
type name
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
>
> > Correct misleading struct type name dim_ch_state_t to dim_ch_state
> > since this not a typedef but a normal structure declaration.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > 1. Correct patch subject and log message. Use struct type name instead of
> > variable name for the change description. Feedback from julia.lawall@...ia.fr
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > 1. Patch introduced in the patch set
> >
> > drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.h | 6 +++---
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > index 4c1f27898a29..a69a61a69283 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int try_start_dim_transfer(struct hdm_channel *hdm_ch)
> > struct list_head *head = &hdm_ch->pending_list;
> > struct mbo *mbo;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > - struct dim_ch_state_t st;
> > + struct dim_ch_state st;
>
> Is there another use in service_done_flag?
Hi,
I did not understand your question fully. This is from a different function
try_start_dim_transfer where the variable st is used down the line in the
execution. This time the channel state is retrieved by calling
dim_get_channel_state function. The state is simply computed and set. Should I
improve this as well?
If you are asking something different, could you please elaborate?
./drv
>
> julia
>
> >
> > BUG_ON(!hdm_ch);
> > BUG_ON(!hdm_ch->is_initialized);
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.c b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.c
> > index 65282c276862..a5d40b5b138a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.c
> > @@ -943,8 +943,8 @@ u8 dim_service_channel(struct dim_channel *ch)
> > return channel_service(ch);
> > }
> >
> > -struct dim_ch_state_t *dim_get_channel_state(struct dim_channel *ch,
> > - struct dim_ch_state_t *state_ptr)
> > +struct dim_ch_state *dim_get_channel_state(struct dim_channel *ch,
> > + struct dim_ch_state *state_ptr)
> > {
> > if (!ch || !state_ptr)
> > return NULL;
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.h b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.h
> > index 20531449acab..ef10a8741c10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ enum mlb_clk_speed {
> > CLK_8192FS = 7,
> > };
> >
> > -struct dim_ch_state_t {
> > +struct dim_ch_state {
> > bool ready; /* Shows readiness to enqueue next buffer */
> > u16 done_buffers; /* Number of completed buffers */
> > };
> > @@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ void dim_service_ahb_int_irq(struct dim_channel *const *channels);
> >
> > u8 dim_service_channel(struct dim_channel *ch);
> >
> > -struct dim_ch_state_t *dim_get_channel_state(struct dim_channel *ch,
> > - struct dim_ch_state_t *state_ptr);
> > +struct dim_ch_state *dim_get_channel_state(struct dim_channel *ch,
> > + struct dim_ch_state *state_ptr);
> >
> > u16 dim_dbr_space(struct dim_channel *ch);
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists