linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] staging: most: dim2: correct misleading struct type name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1E1kv6YSmxVzjkf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:18:34 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com, saurabh.truth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] staging: most: dim2: correct misleading struct
 type name

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 02:00:29AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> >
> > > Correct misleading struct type name dim_ch_state_t to dim_ch_state
> > > since this not a typedef but a normal structure declaration.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v4:
> > >    1. Correct patch subject and log message. Use struct type name instead of
> > >       variable name for the change description. Feedback from julia.lawall@...ia.fr
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >    1. Patch introduced in the patch set
> > >
> > >  drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.c  | 4 ++--
> > >  drivers/staging/most/dim2/hal.h  | 6 +++---
> > >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > > index 4c1f27898a29..a69a61a69283 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int try_start_dim_transfer(struct hdm_channel *hdm_ch)
> > >  	struct list_head *head = &hdm_ch->pending_list;
> > >  	struct mbo *mbo;
> > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > > -	struct dim_ch_state_t st;
> > > +	struct dim_ch_state st;
> >
> > Is there another use in service_done_flag?
>
> Hi,
> I did not understand your question fully. This is from a different function
> try_start_dim_transfer where the variable st is used down the line in the
> execution. This time the channel state is retrieved by calling
> dim_get_channel_state function. The state is simply computed and set. Should I
> improve this as well?
>
> If you are asking something different, could you please elaborate?

Hi Julia,
Can you please review and comment on my response?

>
> ./drv
>
> >
> > julia
> >
> > >
>
>
>