| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y1DNQaoPWxE+rGce@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:23:29 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com,
fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [mm] f35b5d7d67: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -95.5% regression
Hi Ying,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:05:50AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Yujie,
>
> > 32528 48% +147.6% 80547 38% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonHugePages
> > 92821 23% +59.3% 147839 28% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
>
> The Anon pages allocated are much more than the parent commit. This is
> expected, because THP instead of normal page will be allocated for
> aligned memory area.
>
> > 95.23 -79.8 15.41 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__munmap
> > 95.08 -79.7 15.40 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__munmap
> > 95.02 -79.6 15.39 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__munmap
> > 94.96 -79.6 15.37 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_munmap.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__munmap
> > 94.95 -79.6 15.37 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__vm_munmap.__x64_sys_munmap.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__munmap
> > 94.86 -79.5 15.35 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__do_munmap.__vm_munmap.__x64_sys_munmap.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> > 94.38 -79.2 15.22 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unmap_region.__do_munmap.__vm_munmap.__x64_sys_munmap.do_syscall_64
> > 42.74 -42.7 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lru_add_drain.unmap_region.__do_munmap.__vm_munmap.__x64_sys_munmap
> > 42.74 -42.7 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lru_add_drain_cpu.lru_add_drain.unmap_region.__do_munmap.__vm_munmap
> > 42.72 -42.7 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.folio_batch_move_lru.lru_add_drain_cpu.lru_add_drain.unmap_region.__do_munmap
> > 41.84 -41.8 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave.folio_batch_move_lru.lru_add_drain_cpu.lru_add_drain.unmap_region
> > 41.70 -41.7 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave.folio_batch_move_lru.lru_add_drain_cpu.lru_add_drain
> > 41.62 -41.6 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave.release_pages.tlb_batch_pages_flush.tlb_finish_mmu.unmap_region
> > 41.55 -41.6 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave.folio_batch_move_lru.lru_add_drain_cpu
> > 41.52 -41.5 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave.release_pages.tlb_batch_pages_flush.tlb_finish_mmu
> > 41.28 -41.3 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave.release_pages.tlb_batch_pages_flush
>
> In the parent commit, most CPU cycles are used for contention on LRU lock.
>
> > 0.00 +4.8 4.82 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault
> > 0.00 +4.9 4.88 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.zap_huge_pmd.zap_pmd_range.unmap_page_range.unmap_vmas.unmap_region
> > 0.00 +8.2 8.22 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.rmqueue_bulk.rmqueue.get_page_from_freelist
> > 0.00 +8.2 8.23 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.rmqueue_bulk.rmqueue.get_page_from_freelist.__alloc_pages
> > 0.00 +8.3 8.35 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.free_pcppages_bulk.free_unref_page.release_pages
> > 0.00 +8.3 8.35 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.free_pcppages_bulk.free_unref_page.release_pages.tlb_batch_pages_flush
> > 0.00 +8.4 8.37 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.free_pcppages_bulk.free_unref_page.release_pages.tlb_batch_pages_flush.tlb_finish_mmu
> > 0.00 +9.6 9.60 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.free_unref_page.release_pages.tlb_batch_pages_flush.tlb_finish_mmu.unmap_region
> > 0.00 +65.5 65.48 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_page_erms.clear_huge_page.__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault
> > 0.00 +72.5 72.51 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_huge_page.__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault
>
> With the commit, most CPU cycles are consumed for clear huge page. This
> is expected. We allocate more pages, so, we need more cycles to clear
> them.
>
> Check the source code of test case (will-it-scale/malloc1), I found that
> it will allocate some memory with malloc() then free it.
>
> In the parent commit, because the virtual memory address isn't aligned
> with 2M, normal page will be allocated. With the commit, THP will be
> allocated, so more page clearing and less LRU lock contention. I think
> this is the expected behavior of the commit. And the test case isn't so
> popular (malloc() then free() but don't access the memory allocated). So
> this regression isn't important. We can just ignore it.
For what it's worth, I just bisected a massive and visible performance
regression on my Threadripper 3990X workstation to commit f35b5d7d676e
("mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP boundaries"), which seems
directly related to this report/analysis. I initially noticed this
because my full set of kernel builds against mainline went from 2 hours
and 20 minutes or so to over 3 hours. Zeroing in on x86_64 allmodconfig,
which I used for the bisect:
@ 7b5a0b664ebe ("mm/page_ext: remove unused variable in offline_page_ext"):
Benchmark 1: make -skj128 LLVM=1 allmodconfig all
Time (mean ± σ): 318.172 s ± 0.730 s [User: 31750.902 s, System: 4564.246 s]
Range (min … max): 317.332 s … 318.662 s 3 runs
@ f35b5d7d676e ("mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP boundaries"):
Benchmark 1: make -skj128 LLVM=1 allmodconfig all
Time (mean ± σ): 406.688 s ± 0.676 s [User: 31819.526 s, System: 16327.022 s]
Range (min … max): 405.954 s … 407.284 s 3 run
That is a pretty big difference (27%), which is visible while doing a
lot of builds, only because of the extra system time. If there is any
way to improve this, it should certainly be considered.
For now, I'll just revert it locally.
Cheers,
Nathan
# bad: [aae703b02f92bde9264366c545e87cec451de471] Merge tag 'for-6.1-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
# good: [4fe89d07dcc2804c8b562f6c7896a45643d34b2f] Linux 6.0
git bisect start 'aae703b02f92bde9264366c545e87cec451de471' 'v6.0'
# good: [18fd049731e67651009f316195da9281b756f2cf] Merge tag 'arm64-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
git bisect good 18fd049731e67651009f316195da9281b756f2cf
# good: [ab0c23b535f3f9d8345d8ad4c18c0a8594459d55] MAINTAINERS: add RISC-V's patchwork
git bisect good ab0c23b535f3f9d8345d8ad4c18c0a8594459d55
# bad: [f721d24e5dae8358b49b24399d27ba5d12a7e049] Merge tag 'pull-tmpfile' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
git bisect bad f721d24e5dae8358b49b24399d27ba5d12a7e049
# good: [ada3bfb6492a6d0d3eca50f3b61315fe032efc72] Merge tag 'tpmdd-next-v6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd
git bisect good ada3bfb6492a6d0d3eca50f3b61315fe032efc72
# bad: [4e07acdda7fc23f5c4666e54961ef972a1195ffd] mm/hwpoison: add __init/__exit annotations to module init/exit funcs
git bisect bad 4e07acdda7fc23f5c4666e54961ef972a1195ffd
# bad: [000a449345bbb4ffbd880f7143b5fb4acac34121] radix tree test suite: add allocation counts and size to kmem_cache
git bisect bad 000a449345bbb4ffbd880f7143b5fb4acac34121
# bad: [47d55419951312d723de1b6ad53ee92948b8eace] btrfs: convert process_page_range() to use filemap_get_folios_contig()
git bisect bad 47d55419951312d723de1b6ad53ee92948b8eace
# bad: [4d86d4f7227c6f2acfbbbe0623d49865aa71b756] mm: add more BUILD_BUG_ONs to gfp_migratetype()
git bisect bad 4d86d4f7227c6f2acfbbbe0623d49865aa71b756
# bad: [816284a3d0e27828b5cc35f3cf539b0711939ce3] userfaultfd: update documentation to describe /dev/userfaultfd
git bisect bad 816284a3d0e27828b5cc35f3cf539b0711939ce3
# good: [be6667b0db97e10b2a6d57a906c2c8fd2b985e5e] selftests/vm: dedup hugepage allocation logic
git bisect good be6667b0db97e10b2a6d57a906c2c8fd2b985e5e
# bad: [2ace36f0f55777be8a871c370832527e1cd54b15] mm: memory-failure: cleanup try_to_split_thp_page()
git bisect bad 2ace36f0f55777be8a871c370832527e1cd54b15
# good: [9d0d946840075e0268f4f77fe39ba0f53e84c7c4] selftests/vm: add selftest to verify multi THP collapse
git bisect good 9d0d946840075e0268f4f77fe39ba0f53e84c7c4
# bad: [f35b5d7d676e59e401690b678cd3cfec5e785c23] mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP boundaries
git bisect bad f35b5d7d676e59e401690b678cd3cfec5e785c23
# good: [7b5a0b664ebe2625965a0fdba2614c88c4b9bbc6] mm/page_ext: remove unused variable in offline_page_ext
git bisect good 7b5a0b664ebe2625965a0fdba2614c88c4b9bbc6
# first bad commit: [f35b5d7d676e59e401690b678cd3cfec5e785c23] mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP boundaries
Powered by blists - more mailing lists