[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221020081035.4lafnpunbacrhdqs@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:10:35 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-cmos: Fix wake alarm breakage
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Commit 4919d3eb2ec0 ("rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration
> ordering issue") overlooked the fact that cmos_do_probe() depended
> on the preparations carried out by cmos_wake_setup() and the wake
> alarm stopped working after the ordering of them had been changed.
>
> Address this by partially reverting commit 4919d3eb2ec0 so that
> cmos_wake_setup() is called before cmos_do_probe() again and moving
> the rtc_wake_setup() invocation from cmos_wake_setup() directly to the
> callers of cmos_do_probe() where it will happen after a successful
> completion of the latter.
>
> Fixes: 4919d3eb2ec0 ("rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue")
> Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Boot test that previously hit NULL pointer exceptions also completed successfully.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists