lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1FatU6Yf9n5pWB+@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:27:01 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix the initial value of mcg_cap

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> vcpu->arch.mcg_cap represents the value of MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP. It's
> set via ioctl(KVM_X86_SETUP_MCE) from userspace when exposing and
> configuring MCE to guest.
> 
> It's wrong to leave the default value as KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS.

Why?  I agree it's an odd default, but the whole MCE API is odd.  Functionally,
I don't see anything that's broken by allowing the guest to access the MCx_CTL MSRs
by default.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ