linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix the initial value of mcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <092dc961-76f6-331a-6f91-a77a58f6732d@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:07:10 +0800
From:   Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix the initial value of mcg_cap

On 10/20/2022 10:27 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> vcpu->arch.mcg_cap represents the value of MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP. It's
>> set via ioctl(KVM_X86_SETUP_MCE) from userspace when exposing and
>> configuring MCE to guest.
>>
>> It's wrong to leave the default value as KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS.
> 
> Why?  I agree it's an odd default, but the whole MCE API is odd.  Functionally,
> I don't see anything that's broken by allowing the guest to access the MCx_CTL MSRs
> by default.

Yes. Allowing the access doesn't cause any issue for a VM.

However, for the perspective of virtualization. It virtualizes a magic 
hardware that even CPUID.MCA/MCE is not advertised and MCE is not set up 
by userspace, guest is told there are 32 banks and all the banks can be 
accessed.

The patch doesn't fix any issue but try to make the code more reasonable.