lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:07:10 +0800
From:   Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix the initial value of mcg_cap

On 10/20/2022 10:27 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> vcpu->arch.mcg_cap represents the value of MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP. It's
>> set via ioctl(KVM_X86_SETUP_MCE) from userspace when exposing and
>> configuring MCE to guest.
>>
>> It's wrong to leave the default value as KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS.
> 
> Why?  I agree it's an odd default, but the whole MCE API is odd.  Functionally,
> I don't see anything that's broken by allowing the guest to access the MCx_CTL MSRs
> by default.

Yes. Allowing the access doesn't cause any issue for a VM.

However, for the perspective of virtualization. It virtualizes a magic 
hardware that even CPUID.MCA/MCE is not advertised and MCE is not set up 
by userspace, guest is told there are 32 banks and all the banks can be 
accessed.

The patch doesn't fix any issue but try to make the code more reasonable.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ