linux-kernel - Re: SPARC64: getting "no compatible bridge window" errors :/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <NEsdtVI--3-9@tutanota.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:47:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Rogalski <rrogalski@...anota.com>
To:     helgaas@...nel.org
Cc:     alexander.deucher@....com, davem@...emloft.net, lijo.lazar@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        rrogalski@...anota.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SPARC64: getting "no compatible bridge window" errors :/

Hello, very very sorry about the late reply. Life has been hectic. Also, not sure if this is how I reply to one of these, sorry if I screwed it up :)

> This is great, thanks a lot for your report!  Is this a regression?

Believe it or not, I am a brand new SPARC user :). So I can't say right now. Should I try a few old kernel releases to check?

> Any chance you could collect a dmesg log with "ofpci_debug=1"?

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/0ed3c92921d7f88b06654b5f46e9756d/dmesg

> Do the devices we complain about (NICs and storage HBAs 09:00.0, 
> 09:00.1, 0d:00.0, 0d:00.1, 0e:00.0, 0f:00.0, 0001:03:00.0, 
> 0001:03:00.1, 0001:0:00.0, 0001:0a:00.1) work?

Well, I don't have any fiber optic equipment: these just came with the server. Also it has wayy too many NICs. I can't quite say.
However... for the HBAs, that's where my root is :O. This is mildly concerning :D.