[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86262217-a620-dc5b-cf5a-3a23ea869834@socionext.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:35:09 +0900
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: Avoid WARN_ON for PHY_NOLINK during
resuming
Hi Heiner,
Thank you for your comment.
On 2022/10/21 17:38, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 21.10.2022 09:41, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>> When resuming from sleep, if there is a time lag from link-down to link-up
>> due to auto-negotiation, the phy status has been still PHY_NOLINK, so
>> WARN_ON dump occurs in mdio_bus_phy_resume(). For example, UniPhier AVE
>> ethernet takes about a few seconds to link up after resuming.
>>
> That autoneg takes some time is normal. If this would actually the root
> cause then basically every driver should be affected. But it's not.
Although the auto-neg should happen normally, I'm not sure about other
platforms.
>> To avoid this issue, should remove PHY_NOLINK the WARN_ON conditions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index 57849ac0384e..c647d027bb5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -318,12 +318,12 @@ static __maybe_unused int mdio_bus_phy_resume(struct
>> device *dev)
>> phydev->suspended_by_mdio_bus = 0;
>>
>> /* If we managed to get here with the PHY state machine in a state
>> - * neither PHY_HALTED, PHY_READY nor PHY_UP, this is an indication
>> - * that something went wrong and we should most likely be using
>> - * MAC managed PM, but we are not.
>> + * neither PHY_HALTED, PHY_READY, PHY_UP nor PHY_NOLINK, this is an
>> + * indication that something went wrong and we should most likely
>> + * be using MAC managed PM, but we are not.
>> */
>
> Did you read the comment you're changing? ave_resume() calls phy_resume(),
> so you should follow the advice in the comment.
I understand something is wrong with "PHY_NOLINK" here, and need to investigate
the root cause of the phy state issue.
Thank you,
---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists