[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1J5wx63bzq4tnik@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:51:47 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:42:31AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:19:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 07:07:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Remember that device_property backs onto fwnode so properties can come
> > > from _DSD properties too since fwnode will query any source of
>
> > > I think the code would have to also check that it was a
> > > MFD child at least,
>
> > That's exactly what I'm talking about when said "named resource check".
>
> Like I say a property can come from any firmware interface.
But I'm talking about resource (not a property) as IO memory. It doesn't come
via firmware at all. Have you had a chance to look into the v4?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists