[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1J7iJ967d0I83oZ@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:59:20 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:51:47PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:42:31AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > That's exactly what I'm talking about when said "named resource check".
> > Like I say a property can come from any firmware interface.
> But I'm talking about resource (not a property) as IO memory. It doesn't come
> via firmware at all. Have you had a chance to look into the v4?
On DT based systems resources can be named by the firmware, I don't know
if that's possible with ACPI but as the name suggests the driver gets
used on PXA systems too.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists