lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166636630417.311920.2410945917919956553.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:31:44 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 0/5] spi: pxa2xx: Pass the SSP type via device property

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:44:55 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Currently the SPI PXA2xx devices on Intel platforms can be instantiated
> via the following paths:
>  1) as ACPI LPSS device on Haswell, Bay Trail and Cherry Trail;
>  2) as ACPI LPSS device on the Sky Lake and newer;
>  3) as PCI LPSS device on Haswell, Bay Trail and Cherry Trail;
>  4) as PCI LPSS device on the Sky Lake and newer;
>  5) as PCI device via ID table.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[4/5] spi: pxa2xx: Consistently use dev variable in pxa2xx_spi_init_pdata()
      commit: 8fc8250a1586008cceaadd6f4df9db23643d4b3e
[5/5] spi: pxa2xx: Switch from PM ifdeffery to pm_ptr()
      commit: 6c3c438c085b2cd79b3291b67f8f7ece62371947

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ