linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 642/717] btrfs: dump extra info if one free space cache has more bitmaps than it should

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221022072526.841385048@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:28:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 642/717] btrfs: dump extra info if one free space cache has more bitmaps than it should

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit 62cd9d4474282a1eb84f945955c56cbfc42e1ffe ]

There is an internal report on hitting the following ASSERT() in
recalculate_thresholds():

 	ASSERT(ctl->total_bitmaps <= max_bitmaps);

Above @max_bitmaps is calculated using the following variables:

- bytes_per_bg
  8 * 4096 * 4096 (128M) for x86_64/x86.

- block_group->length
  The length of the block group.

@max_bitmaps is the rounded up value of block_group->length / 128M.

Normally one free space cache should not have more bitmaps than above
value, but when it happens the ASSERT() can be triggered if
CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is also enabled.

But the ASSERT() itself won't provide enough info to know which is going
wrong.
Is the bg too small thus it only allows one bitmap?
Or is there something else wrong?

So although I haven't found extra reports or crash dump to do further
investigation, add the extra info to make it more helpful to debug.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index b1ae3ba2ca2c..16710d4571da 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -693,6 +693,12 @@ static void recalculate_thresholds(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl)
 
 	max_bitmaps = max_t(u64, max_bitmaps, 1);
 
+	if (ctl->total_bitmaps > max_bitmaps)
+		btrfs_err(block_group->fs_info,
+"invalid free space control: bg start=%llu len=%llu total_bitmaps=%u unit=%u max_bitmaps=%llu bytes_per_bg=%llu",
+			  block_group->start, block_group->length,
+			  ctl->total_bitmaps, ctl->unit, max_bitmaps,
+			  bytes_per_bg);
 	ASSERT(ctl->total_bitmaps <= max_bitmaps);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.35.1