linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 653/717] clk: zynqmp: pll: rectify rate rounding in zynqmp_pll_round

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221022072527.308699359@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:28:52 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>,
        Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 653/717] clk: zynqmp: pll: rectify rate rounding in zynqmp_pll_round_rate

From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>

[ Upstream commit 30eaf02149ecc3c5815e45d27187bf09e925071d ]

The function zynqmp_pll_round_rate is used to find a most appropriate
PLL frequency which the hardware can generate according to the desired
frequency. For example, if the desired frequency is 297MHz, considering
the limited range from PS_PLL_VCO_MIN (1.5GHz) to PS_PLL_VCO_MAX (3.0GHz)
of PLL, zynqmp_pll_round_rate should return 1.872GHz (297MHz * 5).

There are two problems with the current code of zynqmp_pll_round_rate:

1) When the rate is below PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, it can't find a correct rate
when the parameter "rate" is an integer multiple of *prate, in other words,
if "f" is zero, zynqmp_pll_round_rate won't return a valid frequency which
is from PS_PLL_VCO_MIN to PS_PLL_VCO_MAX. For example, *prate is 33MHz
and the rate is 660MHz, zynqmp_pll_round_rate will not boost up rate and
just return 660MHz, and this will cause clk_calc_new_rates failure since
zynqmp_pll_round_rate returns an invalid rate out of its boundaries.

2) Even if the rate is higher than PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, there is still a risk
that zynqmp_pll_round_rate returns an invalid rate because the function
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST makes some loss in the fractional part. If the parent
clock *prate is 33333333Hz and we want to set the PLL rate to 1.5GHz,
this function will return 1499999985Hz by using the formula below:
    value = *prate * DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate, *prate)).
This value is also invalid since it's slightly smaller than PS_PLL_VCO_MIN.
because DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST makes some loss in the fractional part.

Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220826142030.213805-1-quanyang.wang@windriver.com
Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@....com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c b/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c
index 91a6b4cc910e..0d3e1377b092 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c
@@ -102,26 +102,25 @@ static long zynqmp_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 				  unsigned long *prate)
 {
 	u32 fbdiv;
-	long rate_div, f;
+	u32 mult, div;
 
-	/* Enable the fractional mode if needed */
-	rate_div = (rate * FRAC_DIV) / *prate;
-	f = rate_div % FRAC_DIV;
-	if (f) {
-		if (rate > PS_PLL_VCO_MAX) {
-			fbdiv = rate / PS_PLL_VCO_MAX;
-			rate = rate / (fbdiv + 1);
-		}
-		if (rate < PS_PLL_VCO_MIN) {
-			fbdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, rate);
-			rate = rate * fbdiv;
-		}
-		return rate;
+	/* Let rate fall inside the range PS_PLL_VCO_MIN ~ PS_PLL_VCO_MAX */
+	if (rate > PS_PLL_VCO_MAX) {
+		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, PS_PLL_VCO_MAX);
+		rate = rate / div;
+	}
+	if (rate < PS_PLL_VCO_MIN) {
+		mult = DIV_ROUND_UP(PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, rate);
+		rate = rate * mult;
 	}
 
 	fbdiv = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate, *prate);
-	fbdiv = clamp_t(u32, fbdiv, PLL_FBDIV_MIN, PLL_FBDIV_MAX);
-	return *prate * fbdiv;
+	if (fbdiv < PLL_FBDIV_MIN || fbdiv > PLL_FBDIV_MAX) {
+		fbdiv = clamp_t(u32, fbdiv, PLL_FBDIV_MIN, PLL_FBDIV_MAX);
+		rate = *prate * fbdiv;
+	}
+
+	return rate;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.35.1