[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1OdSYH45MNbp03k@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:35:37 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:06:06AM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> The fixes are similar, mostly long lines splitting. I had to make
> serveral patches to ease the work of inspectors
>
> v2: fixed a compilation error found by the kernel test robot and
> recompiled the code
>
> v3: tends out the error persisted in the second version. this version is
> a correction of that
>
> Tanjuate Brunostar (6):
> staging: vt6655: fix lines ending in a '('
> staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uGetRTSCTSDuration
> staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uFillDataHead
> staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_vGenerateTxParameter
> staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in the rest of the file
> staging: vt6655: refactor code to avoid a line ending in '('
>
> drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 532 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 321 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Any reason you do not have "staging: vt6655:" as the prefix for this 0/X
email subject line?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists