lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:35:37 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c

On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:06:06AM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> The fixes are similar, mostly long lines splitting. I had to make
> serveral patches to ease the work of inspectors
> 
> v2: fixed a compilation error found by the kernel test robot and
> recompiled the code
> 
> v3: tends out the error persisted in the second version. this version is
> a correction of that
> 
> Tanjuate Brunostar (6):
>   staging: vt6655: fix lines ending in a '('
>   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uGetRTSCTSDuration
>   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uFillDataHead
>   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_vGenerateTxParameter
>   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in the rest of the file
>   staging: vt6655: refactor code to avoid a line ending in '('
> 
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 532 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 321 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

Any reason you do not have "staging: vt6655:" as the prefix for this 0/X
email subject line?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ