linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHJEyKXYtMiUusyq8427SjJo5VFO09O6HH0kkBYsmYzx8BMeAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:22:00 +0100
From:   Tanju Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c

On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 9:15 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:06:06AM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> > The fixes are similar, mostly long lines splitting. I had to make
> > serveral patches to ease the work of inspectors
> >
> > v2: fixed a compilation error found by the kernel test robot and
> > recompiled the code
> >
> > v3: tends out the error persisted in the second version. this version is
> > a correction of that
> >
> > Tanjuate Brunostar (6):
> >   staging: vt6655: fix lines ending in a '('
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uGetRTSCTSDuration
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uFillDataHead
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_vGenerateTxParameter
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in the rest of the file
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor code to avoid a line ending in '('
> >
> >  drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 532 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 321 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
>
> Any reason you do not have "staging: vt6655:" as the prefix for this 0/X
> email subject line?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

oh I forgot to include it