| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 19:19:06 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+78a0878b3076f71313b3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in
break_ksm
On 2022/10/20 22:40, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This might be due a missing page table lock unlock:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8c86678a-3bfb-3854-b1a9-ae5969e730b8@redhat.com
>
Yes. Already fixed by commit b232a629b70cccb65d0c in linux-next-20221021.
#syz fix: mm/ksm: convert break_ksm() to use walk_page_range_vma()
[ 72.213837] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/ksm.c:500
[ 72.216580] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 874, name: a.out
[ 72.218083] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[ 72.219161] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
[ 72.220245] Preemption disabled at:
[ 72.220253] [<ffffffff95804158>] break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.223460]
[ 72.223619] ============================================
[ 72.224514] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 72.225491] 6.1.0-rc1-next-20221021+ #2 Tainted: G W
[ 72.226750] --------------------------------------------
[ 72.227724] a.out/874 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 72.228588] ffff94fdc6756888 (ptlock_ptr(page)#2){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.230229]
[ 72.230229] but task is already holding lock:
[ 72.231321] ffff94fdc6756888 (ptlock_ptr(page)#2){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.232975]
[ 72.232975] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 72.234233] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 72.234233]
[ 72.235256] CPU0
[ 72.235758] ----
[ 72.236231] lock(ptlock_ptr(page)#2);
[ 72.237118] lock(ptlock_ptr(page)#2);
[ 72.237808]
[ 72.237808] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 72.237808]
[ 72.239045] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 72.239045]
[ 72.241781] 6 locks held by a.out/874:
[ 72.243135] #0: ffff94fdc6345490 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x70/0x100
[ 72.245232] #1: ffff94fdc5f75c90 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11e/0x230
[ 72.247591] #2: ffff94fdc0c6bdc8 (kn->active#83){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x126/0x230
[ 72.250739] #3: ffffffff96ec7d10 (ksm_thread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: run_store+0x59/0x390
[ 72.253067] #4: ffff94fdc47f8ff0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: run_store+0x142/0x390
[ 72.255283] #5: ffff94fdc6756888 (ptlock_ptr(page)#2){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.258262]
[ 72.258262] stack backtrace:
[ 72.260362] CPU: 2 PID: 874 Comm: a.out Tainted: G W 6.1.0-rc1-next-20221021+ #2
[ 72.262633] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 72.264773] Call Trace:
[ 72.265911] <TASK>
[ 72.267006] dump_stack_lvl+0x5a/0x88
[ 72.268401] find_cpio_data.cold-0x6/0x5b
[ 72.269836] __lock_acquire.cold+0xae/0x2dc
[ 72.271327] ? lock_is_held_type+0xf3/0x160
[ 72.272764] lock_acquire+0xd6/0x320
[ 72.274075] ? break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.275619] ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x64/0xb0
[ 72.277104] ? vprintk_emit+0xd0/0x360
[ 72.278437] ? __memcpy-0xd/0x30
[ 72.279646] _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x90
[ 72.280894] ? break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.282329] break_ksm_pmd_entry+0xf8/0x290
[ 72.283761] walk_pgd_range+0x623/0xa90
[ 72.285092] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x86/0x120
[ 72.286563] __walk_page_range+0x17b/0x190
[ 72.287985] ? lock_is_held_type+0xf3/0x160
[ 72.289336] walk_page_range_vma+0xae/0xf0
[ 72.290643] break_ksm.part.0+0x7d/0xe0
[ 72.292001] unmerge_ksm_pages+0x77/0xd0
[ 72.293321] run_store+0x187/0x390
[ 72.294540] kobj_attr_store+0x12/0x40
[ 72.295817] sysfs_kf_write+0x4b/0x80
[ 72.297035] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x171/0x230
[ 72.298373] vfs_write+0x357/0x530
[ 72.299616] ksys_write+0x70/0x100
[ 72.300758] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30
[ 72.301947] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xa0
[ 72.303155] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x37/0x60
[ 72.304590] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xa0
[ 72.305721] ? irqentry_exit+0x6b/0xa0
[ 72.306877] ? __memcpy-0xd/0x30
[ 72.307919] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x86/0x120
[ 72.309143] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x25/0x40
[ 72.310548] ? irqentry_exit+0x6b/0xa0
[ 72.311637] ? exc_page_fault+0xa8/0x310
[ 72.312755] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
[ 72.314108] RIP: 0033:0x7fe2ca91ea3d
[ 72.315121] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c3 a3 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 72.319924] RSP: 002b:00007ffdb4131158 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 72.321870] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fe2ca91ea3d
[ 72.323727] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 72.325523] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 72.327431] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffdb4131278
[ 72.329256] R13: 00005648601cc060 R14: 00005648601cedc0 R15: 00007fe2cab74040
[ 72.331140] </TASK>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists