[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f79b22ea-2018-cb57-81b3-cdab2f66ea67@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 19:46:40 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Do not fail Intel-PT misc test w/o
libpython
On 21/10/22 21:10, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The virtuall LBR test uses a python script to check the max size of
> branch stack in the Intel-PT generated LBR. But it didn't check whether
> python scripting is available (as it's optional).
>
> Let's skip the test if the python support is not available.
>
> Fixes: f77811a0f625 ("perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Add 9 tests")
> Cc: Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh
> index 4c0aabbe33bd..f5ed7b1af419 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh
> @@ -526,6 +526,12 @@ test_kernel_trace()
> test_virtual_lbr()
> {
> echo "--- Test virtual LBR ---"
> + # Check if python script is supported
> + libpython=$(perf version --build-options | grep python | grep -cv OFF)
> + if [ "${libpython}" != "1" ] ; then
> + echo "SKIP: python scripting is not supported"
> + return 2
> + fi
>
> # Python script to determine the maximum size of branch stacks
> cat << "_end_of_file_" > "${maxbrstack}"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists